Framing analysis
The number a reader takes away is not always the number the article supports.
NeutralEye reads an article and shows the choices behind it. Here is one, found in a report run over five outlets covering the same earnings story.
24/7 Wall St, filed 7 August 2026
“HONA shares crashed 34% after adjusted EPS fell 32% and management slashed full-year organic growth guidance”
Further down, the same article: shares “fell 23.2% in the most recent session” and “are down 34.3% over the past month”.
Both figures are in the same article, so this takes about thirty seconds to check.
The analysis opens inside the paragraph, at the line it is about. Nothing is scored, and no outlet is rated.
The same checks, pointed two ways. At someone else’s article, or at your own draft.
Free tools
Read with the margin filled in
The extension marks the lines that carry framing choices and sets the note under the line, on the article in front of you. For anything outside the browser, paste a link into the analyzer and get the same reading back.
Free. No account needed to read.
The writing companion will not draft for you.
It runs the same checks on your own draft, marks the lines where your framing is doing the work, and stops there. The refusal is the design. It is in build now.
Coverage reports
A written report on how your story was covered
For communications and investor relations teams. Several outlets on one story, read separately and then set against each other: what each one foregrounded, what it left out that others carried, whose voices it included, and where the accounts diverge.
Every claim is traced to a verbatim span in the article that carried it. Reports describe editorial choices. They do not rate outlets or place them on a spectrum.
The Honeywell analysis below is one of these, run over five outlets.
One story, five outlets
Two outlets covering the same quarter told readers a different number was expected.
Every claim in the story, set against every outlet. Pick a cell to see what the analysis holds for it.
5 of 5 reproduced findings shownCorroboration threshold: 3 of the other 4 outlets
CNBC Investing Club
Backlog increased 9% year over year.
Absent from CNBC Investing Club, and carried by 3 of the other four outlets: The Motley Fool, Quartz, AeroTime.
Readers receive strong order and win figures but not the clearest quantified measure of accumulated demand.
Checked against this article's filing time and its format, and recorded as an editorial choice rather than a consequence of either.
When each article was filed
An article cannot report what came after it
Thirty five hours separate the first filing from the last. The teal run is the window an article stayed open for updates. Absences explained by filing time are excluded from the findings rather than counted against the outlet.
Two independent passes
Reported only if it reproduced
Pass onePass two
Five findings, both passes. The comparison runs twice under identical settings and only what appears in both is published. On this analysis 252 of 252 quotations were located in the source text.